Course:
Unit 5 Assignment Rubric
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
Criterion 1 Integrated Initiative Objectives (Paper) | Level III Max Points15 points | Level II Max Points12 points | Level I Max Points9 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
States and explains three primary objectives along with the expected outcomes. | States and explains two primary objectives along with the expected outcomes. | States and explains one primary objective along with the expected outcome. | Does not include primary objectives or expected outcomes. | / 15 |
Criterion 2 Integration Plan (Paper) | Level III Max Points50 points | Level II Max Points40 points | Level I Max Points30 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Provides a comprehensive analysis of the integration plan, elaborating on all six requirements:Selection of the Integration ToolDataMapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing Integration Patient Data Accessibility and Accuracy | Provides a well- structured discussion of the integration plan, elaborating on four or five requirements:Selection of the Integration ToolData Mapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing Integration Patient Data Accessibility and Accuracy | Presents a basic overview of the integration plan, elaborating on three or four requirements:Selection of the Integration ToolDataMapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing Integration Patient Data Accessibility and Accuracy | Does not elaborate on at least three requirements. | / 50 |
Level III Max Points20 points | Level II Max Points16 points | Level I Max Points12 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Criterion 3 | Level III Max Points20 points | Level II Max Points16 points | Level I Max Points12 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Future Planning (Paper) | Explains threepotential future directions or | Explains twopotential future directions or | Explains onepotential future direction or | Does not explainany future direction or | / 20 |
enhancements to | enhancements to | enhancement to | enhancement to | ||
further leverage | further leverage | further leverage | further leverage | ||
data integration. | data integration. | data integration. | data integration. |
Criterion 4 Integration Initiative Objectives (Poster) | Level III Max Points5 points | Level II Max Points4 points | Level I Max Points3 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
States three primary objectives along with the expected outcomes. | States two primary objectives along with the expected outcomes. | States one primary objective along with the expected outcome. | Does not include primary objectives or expected outcomes. | / 5 |
Criterion 5 | Level III Max Points50 points | Level II Max Points40 points | Level I Max Points30 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Integration Plan (Poster) | Provides an overview of the integration plan, with all six requirements: | Provides an overview of the integration plan, with four or five requirements: | Provides an overview of the integration plan, with three requirements: | Does not provide at least three requirements. | / 50 |
Selection of the Integration ToolDataMapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing Integration Patient Data Accessibility and Accuracy | Selection of the Integration ToolDataMapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing IntegrationPatient Data Accessibility and Accuracy | Selection of the Integration ToolDataMapping and Standardizat ionEHRIntegration Appointmen t Scheduling Billing Integration Patient Data Accessibility and Accuracy |
Level III Max Points5 points | Level II Max Points4 points | Level I Max Points3 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Criteria 6 Level III Max Points
Level II Max Points
4 points
Level I Max Points
3 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Future Plan (Poster) | Lists threepotential future directions or | Lists two potentialfuture directions or enhancements to | Lists one potentialfuture direction or enhancement to | Does not explainany future direction or | / 5 |
enhancements to | further leverage | further leverage | enhancement to | ||
further leverage | data integration. | data integration. | further leverage | ||
data integration. | data integration. |
Criteria 7 | Level III Max Points20 points | Level II Max Points16 points | Level I Max Points12 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
Poster Format | Poster includes at least three relevant | Poster includes at least two relevant | Poster includes at least one relevant | Poster does not include at a | / 20 |
images, graphs, | images, graphs, | image, graph, | relevant image, | ||
and/or charts that | and/or charts that | and/or chart that | graph, and/or chart | ||
effectively | effectively | effectively | that effectively | ||
communicate the | communicate the | communicates the | communicates the | ||
integration plan. | integration plan. | integration plan. | integration plan. |
Criteria 8 | Level III Max Points10 points | Level II Max Points8 points | Level I Max Points6 points | Not Present0 points | Criterion Score |
APA Citations/ References | Follows APA formatting in the paper | Follows APA formatting for at least | Does not follow APA formatting | No citations or references used. | / 10 |
for citations | one in the | for citations | |||
and | paper: | and | |||
references | citations or | references | |||
in the paper. | references. | in the paper. | |||
At least | Two | One | |||
three | academic | academic | |||
academic | references. | reference. | |||
references | References | References | |||
are | are included | are included | |||
provided. | on the | on the | |||
References | poster. | poster. | |||
are included | |||||
on the | |||||
poster. |
Overall Score