Critical Thinking Assignment (80 Points)
- Read Conner’s (2020) article Bases of power: Understanding where power and influence comes from Links to an external site.. [Attached]
- Write a paper or create a presentation.
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
Please include the following:
- Discuss three bases of individual power from the article (reward, legitimate, referent, etc.) which you find in your workplace or other areas of your life.
- Share at least one example of how these bases of power are used to influence others. Which of the bases do you find audiences to be most receptive or responsive? Are there any bases of power that you feel could be used in a more positive manner?
Your completed assignment must adhere to the following parameters:
- Be a 3 to 4 page paper (not including title page) or a 4 to 5 minute video or PowerPoint presentation including voice over.
- Be formatted according to the CSU Global Writing CenterLinks to an external site.. [All files attached]
Resources
If creating a video or Power Point, resources to assist you in recording your presentation can be found in the Library. To add narration using PowerPoint with Media tab, audio is recommended.
ORG300_Mod3_CT
| ORG300_Mod3_CT | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements | 20 to >16.0 ptsExceptionalIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding the power to influence.16 to >12.0 ptsExcellentIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding the power to influence.12 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding the power to influence.8 to >1.0 ptsMarginalIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding the power to influence.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAssignment requirements are not present. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | 20 to >16.0 ptsExceptionalDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.16 to >12.0 ptsExcellentSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.8 to >1.0 ptsMarginalFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryContent is unsatisfactory. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis | 20 to >16.0 ptsExceptionalProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the power to influence.16 to >12.0 ptsExcellentSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation regarding the power to influence.12 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation regarding the power to influence.8 to >1.0 ptsMarginalFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given regarding the power to influence.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo critical analysis is given. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style | 5 to >4.0 ptsExceptionalProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.4 to >3.0 ptsExcellentProject is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.3 to >2.0 ptsSatisfactoryProject is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.2 to >1.0 ptsMarginalProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryOrganization, grammar and style is unsatisfactory. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style | 10 to >8.0 ptsExceptionalProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no significant errors.8 to >6.0 ptsExcellentFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two significant errors.6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactorySignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than three significant errors.4 to >1.0 ptsMarginalNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than four significant errors.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAPA style is unsatisfactory. | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 75 | ||