Course: LGST 101 6380 Introduction to Law (2248)
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
| Criteria | Outstanding | Exceeds Standards | Meets Standards | Approaching Standards | Does Not Meet St |
Case Analysis & Analogical Reasoning | 80 pointsAnalysis compares and contrasts (i.e. analogizes and distinguishes) specific, directly relevant facts from the cases in an accurate and thorough mannerAnalysis provides comprehensive and persuasive support for clearly-stated conclusion in Part II.Range: 72 – 81 | 71.9 pointsAnalysis compares and contrasts (i.e. analogizes and distinguishes) specific, directly relevant facts from the cases in an accurate and largely thorough mannerAnalysis supports clearly- stated conclusion in Part II.Range: 64 – 71.9 | 63.9 pointsAnalysis compares and contrasts specific facts from the cases and supports conclusion in Part II.Minor errors and/or omissions.Range: 56 – 63.9 | 55.9 pointsAnalysis inconsistently and/or inaccurately compares and contrasts facts from the cases to the client’s matter.Significant errors and/or omissions.Range: 48 – 55.9 | 47.9 pointsMajor deficienci do not meet min requirements fo OR To a subst degree, content reflect student’s original thinking composition. OR, did not su project.Range: 0 – 47.9 |
Identification of Mandatory Authority | 50 pointsDemonstrates correct, comprehensive understanding of the rule of precedentAnalysis accurately applies the rule of precedent to the facts of each scenario and correctly identifies any and all cases that are mandatory authoritiesDeftly and correctly incorporates the rule of precedent when explaining which example case helps the client mostRange: 45 – 50 | 44.9 pointsDemonstrates correct understanding of the rule of precedentAnalysis accurately applies the rule of precedent to to the facts of each scenarioand correctly identifies any cases that are mandatory authoritiesCorrectly incorporates rule of precedent when explaining which example case helps the client mostRange: 40 – 44.9 | 39.9 pointsDemonstrates mostly correct understanding of the rule of precedentCorrectly identifies cases that are mandatory in Parts I and II, but analysis is superficial and/or includes some errors or omissionsRange: 35 – 39.9 | 34.9 pointsDoes not demonstrate correct understanding of the rule of precedentAnalysis overlooks or misidentifies cases as mandatory authorities.Significant errors or omissionsRange: 30 – 34.9 | 29.9 pointsMajor errors; do meet minimum requirements.OR did not subm project.Range: 0 – 29.9 |
Effective Communication: Grammar & Formatting | 20 pointsCommunication is effective, engaging, and audience-focused; uses correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling in American English; organized, logically-sequenced | 17.9 pointsCommunication is effective; uses mostly correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling in American English; organized paragraphs and effective transitions help reader | 15.9 pointsCommunication is mostly effective; uses generally correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling in American English; organization generally helps reader understand writer’s ideas, | 13.9 pointsCommunication is minimally effective. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling are distracting and may interfere with reader’s ability to understand the text. | 11.9 pointsWork not submi unresponsive to assignment.Range: 0 – 11.9 |
| paragraphs and smooth, effective transitions help reader understand writer’s ideas, information, analysis, and/or conclusions.Format conveys professionalism and is consistent with assignment instructions.Range: 18 – 20 | understand writer’s ideas, information, analysis, and/or conclusions.Format is appropriate and consistent with assignment instructions.Range: 16 – 17.9 | information, analysis, and/or conclusions.Format is generally appropriate and consistent with assignment instructions.Range: 14 – 15.9 | Organization is confusing and may impede reader’s comprehension.Format is inappropriate or inconsistent with assignment instructions.Range: 12 – 13.9 |
Overall Score