Module 6 Critical Thinking
Based on what you learned in this module, identify one person who you believe possesses primarily leadership behaviors and one who possesses primarily management behaviors. These people could be individuals you work with, family members, or people you know from the news (e.g., celebrities, business executives, politicians, etc.), or YOU. Their roles in leadership and management may be formal or informal.
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
Write a paper or create a presentation addressing the following:
- What are the different types of behaviors you observe between these two individuals?
- How effective are each individual in their role and what suggestions might you make to help each of them improve?
- Based on the two individuals, which one would you aspire to be more like and why?
- What might be some strategies you could consider implementing to help enhance your leadership or management behaviors and why might this be beneficial to your personal or professional lives?
Your completed assignment must adhere to the following parameters:
- Be a 3-to-4-page paper (not including title or reference page) or a 4-to-5-minute video or PowerPoint presentation including voice over.
- Use a minimum of two credible sources to support your ideas, assertions, and claims.
- Resources to assist you in recording your presentation can be found in the Library. Using PowerPoint with Media tab, audio is recommended.
- The CSU Global Visual PresentationsLinks to an external site. guide may be helpful.
- Be formatted according to the CSU Global Writing CenterLinks to an external site..
ORG300_Mod6_CT
| ORG300_Mod6_CT | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements | 20 to >16.0 ptsExceptionalIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.16 to >12.0 ptsExcellentIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.12 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.8 to >1.0 ptsMarginalIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAssignment requirements are not present. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | 25 to >20.0 ptsExceptionalDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of leadership vision, goals and organizational planning models correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.15 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactoryMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.10 to >1.0 ptsMarginalFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryContent is unsatisfactory. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis | 25 to >20.0 ptsExceptionalProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of leadership approaches and behaviors.20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.15 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactoryMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.10 to >1.0 ptsMarginalFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given regarding leadership approaches and behaviors.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo critical analysis is given. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style | 10 to >8.0 ptsExceptionalProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.8 to >6.0 ptsExcellentProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactoryProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.4 to >1.0 ptsMarginalProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryOrganization, grammar and style is unsatisfactory. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style | 10 to >8.0 ptsExceptionalProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no significant errors.8 to >6.0 ptsExcellentFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two significant errors.6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactorySignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than three significant errors.4 to >1.0 ptsMarginalNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than four significant errors.1 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryAPA style is unsatisfactory. | 10 pts |
| Total Points: 90 | ||