HAVE AN INSPIRATION PROBLEM?

Use our database for free to develop your great ideas!

Essay

Get inspired by 12000+ free essay samples

Week 4 Discussion: Your patient has a Personal Health Record… Now what? (graded)

May 13, 2023 | Nursing | Chamberlain College of Nursing | NR361 | 50
Question:
Purpose This week's graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs). CO4 Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4) CO5 Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5) Due Date During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): Posts in the discussion at least two times, and Posts in the discussion on two different days Points Possible 50 points Directions Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students: Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week Integrate outside scholarly sources when required Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers. Best Practices include: Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor. Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts. Select different classmates for your reply each week. Discussion Question Case Study: A 65-year-old woman was just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician's office. She leaves her physician's office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician's office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor's office organization. The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems. As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion. What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study? What safeguards are included in patient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety? Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)? What are challenges for patients that do not have access to all of the PHRs? Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs. Grading To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions. Search entries or author Filter replies by unread Unread Collapse replies Expand replies Subscribe Reply Reply to Week 4 Discussion: Your patient has a Personal Health Record… Now what? (graded) Collapse Subdiscussion Diane Parry Diane Parry Yesterday May 21 at 6:08am Manage Discussion Entry Happy Week 4, Class! We will be discussing a case study on personal health records (PHRs) this week. I look forward to our dialogue. The following Course Outcomes will be covered for Week 4: CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4) CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5) Looking forward to everyone's insights!
Answer:
Clinical decision support involves the use of gadgets and systems that promote the easier running of a hospital. These gadgets help the doctors to keep a reference of their patients as well as patients accessing their doctor's report by phone and keeping track of their appointments. modern days have come with their pros on improving health care as well. The faster and the better a patient is treated the more they revisit that hospital whenever in need. Traditional methods involved a lot of fatigue from all the paperwork done but with computerized alerts and reminders to caregivers the processes have become easier and efficient. By improving a hospital's level of technology and information, the safety of files, reduction of death rates due to fast response, quality and helps the doctors determine a problem quicker from the readings compiled in the gadgets. With improved communication technology, data collection and classification are made easier thus efficient in saving time and patients. In certain economies where nurses and doctors work in shifts while others do a couple of jobs, the traditional care-giving practices can impose fatigue in bulk. With modern information technology developments, a caregiver can be happy clocking in for their shift because it is less engaging. A hospital's involvement with ambulances and flying doctors, modern communication technology is important in scenarios where one needs urgent attendance. (Belasen, 2018). These modern developments are not necessarily gadgets we can have written pamphlets with simple explanations for easier understanding explaining healthy ways to live to avoid our complications. well summarized notes of a patient also prove to be efficient even with a better filing system. Patients need to have faith in a hospital as they go for treatment. An organized person creates a sense of trust which doctors need to instill in their patients. In the patient's rooms installation of any form of entertainment, music that calms the mind also speeds up recovery for the patient is at peace with his mind and not constantly thinking about their illness. In most hospitals, the most commonly used tool is alarms and reminders which are programmed to inform the caregiver of development could be a warning or just a timekeeper. This comes with details of the patient causing alarm, which rooms, and a booklet with their notes and diagnosis. This information haves a caregiver prepared and knowledgeable on what to do. A recorded workflow is efficient in providing reference avoiding the common mistakes of wrong diagnosis or wrong prescriptions. This development has to come up with details on social media accounts about the hospital, its location, and services provided as well as their contacts. This makes it easier for the patient to decide whether which hospital works to their odds. With improved health care universally, life would be a little better. In medicine, we believe in administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. These skills are acquired roundly because a patient requires a doctor or a nurse and they are supposed to be involved in all attributes. This helps in pushing the patients towards feeling more comfortable around them and opening up shedding new light to the disease, spirituality by involving our empathetic natures to comfort the patients. (Andrikopoulou,2018). The introduction of modern technology promotes the ethics of a hospital for one knows there are no unauthorized persons who can access hospital records. This improves doctor-patient confidentiality. These portals are accessed on a private connection and it is password protected. Insurance of proper disposal of the doctor's notes after digitally updating them should be highly considered preventing exposure by strangers. One big advantage is they have a portal although not so effective, at least a patient can call the office and receive an answer. This procedure can be very traumatizing otherwise, realizing you carried only half the results and you need all of them to make a conclusive decision. The service provider according to the study shows the involvement by the caregiver who takes their time to explain what the problem might be. The doctor's report is what a patient waits on and to receive it halfway leaves unanswered questions and that might trigger worry and panic to the patients and family which is unhealthy. With one connection of the doctor and the laboratories, theater in an institution, patients would find it easier to access their files with continuity of events. (Doyle, 2016). Patients deserve to know their conditions for closure, as well as acceptance of the ailment and being at peace with it. A full report is needed because one never knows how the disease gets in the next few days. The diagnosis will be slightly different the next time where you had the chance to get better sooner. Accessibility is a problem to most of the population due to illiteracy, ignorance causing unexpected scenes due to lack of knowledge. Some of the old generation with the lack of an efficient caregiver, are at risk of not understanding their situations which might cause accidents. patient health records are to be together since the first time having the device, this promotes comparisons and studying developmental stages as well as rates a disease has been spreading. Provision of these gadgets needs to be publicized bringing good healthcare close to home. As some people accept the changes and grow with them, others remain rigid to a certain idea and public awareness might be the only way to change. References Andrikopoulou, E., & Andrikopoulou, E. (2018). Determine how best electronic personal health records (PHRs) should be designed and utilized to help patients get the full benefit of their prescribed medication. http://isrctn.com/. https://doi.org/10.1186/isrctn13014819 Belasen, A. R., & Belasen, A. (2018). Dual effects of improving doctor-patient communication: Patient satisfaction and hospital ratings. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3096056 Doyle, C. A. (2016). Health information technology use for quality assurance and improvement. Oxford Medicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199366149.003.0015 100
This is a preview

Do you want full access? go premium and unlock all 5 pages

  • Access to all documents
  • Get unlimited Downloads
  • Questions to our Experts