Clinical Analysis And Supervision Plan: Evaluating A Pediatric SOAP Note And Developing A Biopsychosocial Formulation

Not sure if your essay will get a good grade?

WE’LL WRITE DOWN YOUR ESSAY FAST AND PROFESSIONALLY!

Order Now

NURS_6512_Week_10_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week_10_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWith regard to the SOAP note case study provided and using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature:· Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.	12 to >9.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP note and lists detailed additional information to be included in the documentation.9 to >6.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP note and lists additional information to be included in the documentation.6 to >3.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP note and vaguely and/or inaccurately lists additional information to be included in the documentation.3 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately analyzes the subjective portion of the SOAP note, with inaccurate and/or missing additional information included in the documentation.	12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.	12 to >9.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly analyzes the objective portion of the SOAP note and lists detailed additional information to be included in the documentation.9 to >6.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately analyzes the objective portion of the SOAP note and lists additional information to be included in the documentation.6 to >3.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely analyzes the objective portion of the SOAP note and vaguely and/or inaccurately lists additional information to be included in the documentation.3 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately analyzes the objective portion of the SOAP note, with inaccurate and/or missing additional information included in the documentation.	12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?	16 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately identifies whether or not the assessment is supported by the subjective and/or objective information, with a thorough and detailed explanation.13 to >10.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies whether or not the assessment is supported by the subjective and/or objective information, with a clear explanation.10 to >7.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely identifies whether or not the assessment is supported by the subjective and/or objective information, with a vague explanation.7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately identifies whether or not the assessment is supported by the subjective and/or objective information, with an inaccurate or missing explanation.	16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?	20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response thoroughly and accurately describes appropriate diagnostic tests for the case and explains clearly, thoroughly, and accurately how the test results would be used to make a diagnosis.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes appropriate diagnostic tests for the case and explains how the test results would be used to make a diagnosis.14 to >11.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy describes appropriate diagnostic tests for the case and vaguely and/or with some inaccuracy explains how the test results would be used to make a diagnosis.11 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately describes appropriate diagnostic tests for the case, with an inaccurate or missing explanation of how the test results would be used to make a diagnosis.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Would you reject or accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not?· Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differenial diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.	25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response states clearly whether to accept or reject the current diagnosis, with a thorough, accurate, and detailed explanation of sound reasoning. The response clearly, thoroughly, and accurately identifies three conditions as a differential diagnosis, with reasoning that is explained clearly, accurately, and thoroughly using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response states whether to accept or reject the current diagnosis, with an accurate explanation of sound reasoning. The response accurately identifies three conditions as a differential diagnosis, with reasoning that is explained using three different references from current evidence-based literature.19 to >16.0 ptsFairThe response states whether to accept or reject the current diagnosis, with a vague explanation of the reasoning. The response identifies two to three conditions as a differential diagnosis, with reasoning that is explained vaguely and/or inaccurately using three or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.16 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately states or is missing a statement of whether to accept or reject the current diagnosis, with an explanation that is inaccurate and/or missing. The response identifies three or fewer conditions as a differential diagnosis, with reasoning that is missing or explained inaccurately using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.	5 pts
Total Points: 100

Previous Next

NEED AN ORIGINAL PAPER?

Order now and delegate your problem to professionals

Order now

NEED PROFESSIONAL EDITING?