Assignment Requirements

You are required to present a 15-minute presentation which incorporates all three learning outcomes (equivalent to 2500 words). There should be a blend of theory and practice. It is essential that the presentation incorporates critical evaluation of key theories as well as linking these principles to your own current workplace or a business-related context of your choosing.

In the presentation you should consider the different factors that impact on organisational behaviour and suggest possible interventions for promoting team and organisational effectiveness. This is an academic presentation and there should be a strong supporting reference in relation to key theories, models, and frameworks of organisational behaviour which you have applied during this module. It should not be about ‘I’ or ‘my’. Rather, it should focus on ‘the organisation’, ‘the team’ etc.

A key requirement is to synthesise, critically evaluate and interpret contemporary organisational practice with an understanding of the different factors that impact on organisational behaviour. The areas which you need to consider:

Organisational culture
Organisational development and change
Organisational effectiveness
Organisational learning and knowledge management
Team effectiveness/HR
People Management

Module Number	Credit rating	Learning outcomes	Brief summary of Assessment	Proposed date of submission
7701ORYXLM	10	LO1. Critically assess key organisational behaviour theories, models and frameworks including culture and team dynamics.LO2. Synthesise and critically evaluate organisational theory and its relationship to people management, learning, development and change.LO3. Critically engage with the current business context in order to design bespoke interventions for promoting team and organisational effectiveness.	A 15min individual presentation incorporating all three learning outcomes. 5min Q and A	5th of December 2023

Your presentation must not exceed 12 slides. A suggested structure is:

Introductory slide
Maximum 3 slides covering themes from LO1.
Maximum 3 slides covering themes from LO2.
Maximum 3 slides covering themes from LO3.
Concluding thoughts
Bibliography

You may choose to adopt a less linear approach and integrate the various themes across all slides. This is entirely up to you and there is no preferred structure. The Presentation should be a formal discussion of your key points with reference to relevant literature. It should be written in continuous prose incorporating the conventions of quality academic discussion.

Each slide must not exceed one side of A4. There will be opportunities to discuss the nature of the assignment within sessions. There will be a dedicated Q and A assessment discussion board on Canvas to ask and answer questions. Please note that your assignment will be marked based on the assignment outline above and according to the marking criteria set out in this Assessment Brief.

Submitting your Assignment

The submission of the assignment needs to be uploaded electronically through the module Canvas site. There will be a link on the 7701ORYXLM Canvas page which will contain upload instructions. Your upload should be Word format with your presentation slide pasted into each page. The commentary should be written in Arial font (size 12) with 1.5 line spacing. Failure to submit by the deadline means you will receive a mark of zero unless an extension has been received and authorised by the module leader before the deadline. When submitting coursework on Turnitin, ensure you obtain and retain a submission receipt. If you encounter any problems when uploading your work, please contact your tutor immediately via email and attach a copy of your assignment.

Submission and feedback dates

You are required to submit your assessment (individual presentation in Word format) on Tuesday the 5^th of December 2023 before 12:00PM (Noon) using the online submission area on Canvas module site. Please do give attention to the instructions provided at the time of submission.

Assessment item	Weighting%	AssessmentSubmission date	Feedbackof results date
Presentation(2500 words equivalent) (Learning outcomes 1,2 & 3)	100	Week 13 5^th of December 2023	28th of December 2023

Referencing

In your assignments, you should ensure that you cite and reference all your sources, conforming to the Harvard convention. You should include references to all cited sources in a single “References” section at the end of the assignment.

Feedback

All feedback and marks provided are un-moderated and subject to change during the internal and external moderation process. You should copy your work before submission. We retain the assignments for the moderation process.

Marking Criteria

In marking individual assignments, grading is likely to equate to the following criteria. There may be occasions where weaknesses against one criterion are offset by strengths against another.

You should be able to:

Use appropriate format and present items in a logical structure.
Use Harvard referencing in text and bibliography. Show a high level of writing skills with error free spelling.

Grade	Features of Assignment
>70%Distinction	Responds to the question directly and fullyDemonstrates exceptional understanding and knowledge of a wide range of theoretical models and applies them appropriately Offers an original or innovative argument or perspectiveAppreciates the holistic nature of business behaviourIs highly adept and in deploying conceptsIs written with flair, style and technical precision using the Harvard referencing system correctly
60% – 69%Merit	Responds directly to the questionHas a clear and convincing argumentIs aware of issues involved in the question Blends conceptual awareness with reference to texts or appropriate examplesIs coherently organised Contains discussion and analysis rather than description or narration Applies appropriate modelsIs properly referenced fluently written
50% – 59%Average	Contains the main points and arguments but those are not fully developed or articulated or the organisation is not coherentAttempts the application of modelsIs thorough enough, but does not show much evidence of engagement with concepts or material beyond what is fundamentally required or what has been given in lectures and seminarsWork in this classification is considered good work, though not as inventive or wide- ranging as work in the Merit Class
40% – 49%Borderline Fail	Descriptive rather than analytic workDoes not attempt the application of modelsCovers the basics but without real argument or conceptual insight

	Generalised rather than specific attention to the questionAdequate but modest writing and presentation, referencing practice is inconsistent
35% – 39%Fail	Does not cover adequate ground in response to the questionIs muddled in organisationIs poorly written and organised, does not use a referencing systemHas some grasp of what is demanded, but does not indicate understanding of the issue involved
<35%Significant Fail	The student does not know the material or understand the demands of the questionSome attempt to answer the question may mean some marks can be given

The assignments will pass if you have demonstrated that you have met all learning outcomes and demonstrate a standard of academic thinking and writing appropriate to Level 7 standards. The level 7 grids will help you to identify what the pass standard is, you need 50% or above to pass the module. If you feel you need help or clarification consult with your tutor.

Marking Scheme

	Marking Criteria	Marks
1.	Has the student fully addressed the learning outcomes, and to what extent? Are independent thought and critical analysis evident? Is the presentation sufficiently detailed, accurate and the key points highlighted?	30
2.	To what extent have they critically evaluated academic theories and frameworks to underpin their theories, solutions and assumptions? Have succinct examples been used to demonstrate application of knowledge and theories?	30
3.	Have they used valid, up to date sources to obtain their information and to analyse the question? Is the work correctly referenced throughout?	15
4.	Have they set out clear objectives, rigorously structured their presentation and made their arguments flow clearly and succinctly? Does the presentation adhere to the parameters set?	15
5.	Have they used their presentation media effectively? How have they attempted to engage the audience? Are complex issues explained or conveyed effectively?	10
6.	General Comment	0
	Mark	100