Due Points 80 Submitting a file upload Available
See pp. 42-43 in the syllabus. This assignment is considered the “final” project for this course with the cultural/self-care gathering that occurs during finals week completing the required 16-week course. Both the Applied Theory Paper and 16- week gathering at the designated “final” date/time are mandatory.
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
04/27/22 (Wednesday) @ 5:00pm ~ reopened site for individuals to re-upload their papers through SimCheck/VeriSite. No other revisions should be made at this time; thank you.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
| Body of Paper: Introduction to paper/theorists | 5 ptsFull creditProvided a brief history of theory/model explaining the origins of the theory/model. | 2.5 pts Partial creditProvided a biographical history of the theorist, not an explanation as to the evolution/theoretical origins of each theory/model. | 0 pts No credit | 5 pts | ||||
| Body of Paper: Description of theories/models | 5 ptsFull creditDescribed each theory/model including conceptual level, basic idea(s) of each, & areas of concern of each, as applicable. | 2.5 pts Partial creditProvided a partial description each theory/model including conceptual level, basicidea(s) of each, & areas of concern for each, as applicable. | 0 pts No credit | 5 pts | ||||
| Body of Paper: Theory/Model analysis | 5 ptsFull creditComprehensively analyzed/evaluated theory/model in relationship to metaparadigm from theory/model’s author’s view. | 2.5 pts Partial CreditPartially includes discussion of nursing metaparadigm as they related to each theory or model. | 0 pts No credit | 5 pts | ||||
| Body of Paper: Arguments | 10 pts Full creditThoroughly discussed if theory/model was supported by research; articulatesusefulness, relevance; describes current application in research and practice. | 5 ptsPartial creditPartially discussed if theory/model was supported by research; some discussion of usefulness, relevance; some discussion of application to research and practice. | 0 pts No Marks | 10 pts | ||||
| Body of Paper: Theory/Model comparing/contrasting | 20 pts Full creditClearly described the differences & similarities between the 2 theories/models, demonstrated through application of theories/models to same clinical scenario. Addressed clarity, simplicity, generalizability of theory/model. Effectively demonstrates ability to apply theory/model into same clinical scenario. | 10 pts Partial creditPartially described the differences & similarities between the 2theories/models as well as included some discussion around theory/model clarity,simplicity, and generalizability. Included some application of theory/model is same clinical scenario. | 0 pts No credit | 20 pts | ||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
| Body of Paper: Conclusion | 5 ptsFull creditProvided a synopsis of the paper including purpose of paper, thesis statement, keyideas, & recommendation for future (the “sowhat” or “next steps”). | 2.5 pts Partial creditProvided partial synopsis of the paper; purpose of paper, thesis statement, key ideas, and/or recommendation for future (the “so what” or “next steps”) are missing. | 0 pts No credit | 5 pts | ||
| Research: References, citations, & quotations | 10 pts Full creditComplied completely with APA 7th edition for references, citations, & quotations. | 5 ptsPartial creditIdentified 5+ errors related to APA 6th edition for references, citations, & quotations. | 0 pts No credit | 10 pts | ||
| Research: Resource completion | 5 ptsFull creditIncluded 4+ scholarly articles or resources (2 per theory/model). | 2.5 pts Partial creditIncluded 2 scholarly articles or resources (e.g., 1 per theory/model), which may/may not have been appropriate resources. | 0 pts No credit | 5 pts | ||
| Text Mechanics: Writing | 15 pts Full creditAll elements of analysis included; writing without errors (grammatical, form, spelling, punctuation); overall impression is positive. | 7.5 pts Partial creditMost of analysis elements are present; writing with 5+ errors (grammatical, form, spelling, punctuation); overall impression is fair to good. | 0 pts No credit | 15 pts | ||
| Total Points: 80 | ||||||