Research Methods: Comparison of two research papersWord Count: 2,500 wordsGeneral GuidanceYour assignment should be word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted), using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page.The word limits stated for this assignment excludes the reference list at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and graphs).Appendices are not considered a supplement, and thus, will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded, however it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in the word count.The majority of references should come from primary sources (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise area specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use Harvard style of referencing.Please indicate the word count length at the end of your assignment.Learning outcomes assessed
Critically discuss the philosophical perspectives that underpin health and social research Critically evaluate data collection techniques Understand different approaches to the analysis of numerical and non-numerical data Critically explore the ethical dimensions of research
Discuss the research approaches in the two published research papers; andDebate the strengths, weaknesses and philosophical differences by describing, contrasting and comparing the underlying philosophical perspectives, ethical dimensions and methods of data collection and analysis in the two published research paper
Lemamsha, H., Randhawa, G., & Papadopoulos, C. (2019). Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Libyan men and women. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8531360Lemamsha, H., Papadopoulos, C., & Randhawa, G. (2018). Understanding the risk and protective factors associated with obesity amongst Libyan adults: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5411-z
Kumari, A., Ranjan, P., Chopra, S., Kaur, D., Kaur, T., Kalanidhi, K. B. et al. (2021). What Indians think of the COVID-19 vaccine: A qualitative study comprising focus group discussions and thematic analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 15(3), 679-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.03.021Haque, M.M.A., Rahman, M.L., Hossian, M., Matin, K.F., Nabi, M.H., Saha, S., Hasan, M., Manna, R.M., Barsha, S.Y., Hasan, S.R. and Siddiquea, S.R. (2021). Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine and its determinants: evidence from a large sample study in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 7(6), p.e07376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07376