Purpose
Need answer to this question?
Order an original paper Now!
We’re giving you a 15% discount on your first Order.
Discount Code: SKILNEW15
Use the above discount code during checkout
and Scoring Rubric
The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with the development of a clinical question of interest to you using the PICOT format along with designing and documenting the results of a search for scientific literature related to the clinical question. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:
CLO 1: Evaluate existing scientific evidence to be used in decision making related to practice, education or leadership.
CLO 2: Develop evidenced-based practice questions using PICOT format.
CLO 3: Conduct a literature search for research evidence related to a practice question.
Requirements
This scholarly paper is due on . An APA template is provided which describes the expectations for each section of this scholarly paper. Graduate level writing is expected. The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.
Scoring Rubric
| Category (points possible) | Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Nearly meets expectations | Does not meet expectation |
| Introduction | 5 | 4 | 3 | <3 |
| (5) | ||||
| The introduction | The introduction | The introduction does | Incomplete or | |
| clearly and concisely | states the paper’s | state the paper’s | unfocused purpose | |
| states the paper’s | purpose in a single | purpose but it is | statement. There is | |
| purpose in a single | sentence but it fails to | convoluted and not | no clear introduction | |
| sentence that is | be engaging. The | engaging. The | of main topic and/or | |
| engaging and | introduction states | introduction does not | the structure of the | |
| thought-provoking. | the main topic but | clearly state the topic | paper is missing. | |
| The introduction | does not adequately | or preview the | ||
| clearly states and | preview the structure | structure and content | ||
| describes the main | of the paper. | of the paper. | ||
| topic and previews | ||||
| the structure and | ||||
| content of the paper. | ||||
| Significance of the | 20 | 18 | 16 | ≤15 |
| Practice Problem (20) | This section effectively describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact as well as other areas of impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area and has significant impact onthe student’s discipline and patient outcomes. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is | This section describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is included. Cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications areincluded if | This section provides a brief description of the problem but fails to describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is limited and cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, andsafety implications | This section identifies the problem but does not effectively describe the significance of the problem. The problem is not a current issue or the issue does have significance to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence and/or cultural, political, legal,ethical, quality, |
| Category (points possible) | Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Nearly meets expectations | Does not meet expectation |
| included. Exemplary | appropriate. There is | are either not | safety, and financial | |
| discussion of cultural, | substantiation with | included even when | implications are not | |
| political, legal, | adequate number | appropriate. There is | included. There is no | |
| ethical, quality, | and quality of | substantiation with | substantiation with an | |
| safety, and financial | professional | only a limited number | adequate number | |
| implications is | references with no | and quality of | and quality of | |
| included if | uncited statements of | professional | professional | |
| appropriate. There is | fact. | references with no | references and/or | |
| substantiation with | uncited statements of | there are uncited | ||
| adequate number | fact. | statements of fact. | ||
| and quality of | ||||
| professional | ||||
| references with no | ||||
| uncited statements of | ||||
| fact. | ||||
| Population (10) | 10 | 9 | 8 | ≤7 |
| There is a clear | There is a description | There is a description | The description of | |
| description of the | of the population of | of the population of | population of interest | |
| population of interest, | interest, which | interest which | does not include at | |
| which includes at | includes at least two | includes two | least two | |
| least two | characteristics, but | characteristics but | characteristics. | |
| characteristics (e.g., | there is little | there is no | ||
| age, setting, | explanation of why | explanation of why | ||
| condition), and | these characteristics | these characteristics | ||
| includes elaboration | are pertinent to the | are pertinent to the | ||
| of why these | question. | question. | ||
| characteristics are | ||||
| pertinent to the | ||||
| question. | ||||
| Intervention (10) | 10 | 9 | 8 | ≤7 |
| The intervention is | The intervention is | The intervention is | The intervention is | |
| operationally defined; | thoroughly described; | described but clarity | listed but not | |
| an exemplary | a brief summary of | is lacking; little | described; no | |
| summary of research | evidence supporting | evidence supporting | evidence supporting | |
| evidence supporting | the intervention is | the intervention is | the intervention is | |
| the intervention is | provided but little | provided. | provided. | |
| provided. | research evidence is | |||
| provided. | ||||
| Comparison (10) | 10 | 9 | 8 | ≤7 |
| The comparison is | The comparison is | The comparison is | No comparison is | |
| operationally defined | thoroughly described | identified but not | identified. | |
| OR if the comparison | OR if the comparison | described OR if the | ||
| is “standard practice”, | is “standard practice”, | comparison is | ||
| that practice is | that practice is | “standard practice”, | ||
| thoroughly described | described. | that practice is not | ||
| with references. | described. | |||
| Outcome(s) (10) | 10 | 9 | 8 | ≤7 |
| The outcome(s) is | The outcome(s) is | The outcome(s) is | No outcome is | |
| identified and | identified and | identified but no | identified. | |
| described including | described including a | proposed method of | ||
| proposed methods of | proposed method of | measurement, such | ||
| measurement, such | measurement, such | as existing tool, is | ||
| as existing tool. | as existing tool. | included. | ||
| Citations are used to | ||||
| show how this | ||||
| outcome has been | ||||
| measured in studies. |
| Category (points possible) | Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Nearly meets expectations | Does not meet expectation |
| Timing (5) | 5 | 4 | 3 | <3 |
| The time frame is identified and rationale is provided OR the time frame is identified as not significant and excellent rationale is provided. | The time frame is identified and rationale is provided but limited OR the time frame is identified as not significant and appropriate rationaleis provided. | The time frame is identified but no rationale is provided OR the time frame is identified as not significant but rationale is limited. | No time frame is identified though a time frame is important to the question or the time frame is identified but no rationale is given. | |
| Search Strategy and | 25 | 21 | 18 | ≤17 |
| Results (25) | There is an | The discussion of the | The discussion of the | The search strategy |
| exemplary discussion | search strategy | search strategy | and results are | |
| of the search strategy | includes keywords, | includes keywords, | superficial and/or | |
| which includes | inclusion and | inclusion and | difficult to | |
| keywords (with | exclusion criteria, | exclusion criteria, | understand. The | |
| alternate spellings, | data bases used and | data bases used and | PRISMA figure is | |
| abbreviations, etc.), | results of the search. | results of the search. | missing and/or is | |
| MeSH headings, | Any studies which | There is no | inaccurate or illogical. | |
| inclusion and | meet inclusion criteria | explanation of | ||
| exclusion criteria, | and do not meet | exclusion of studies | ||
| data bases used and | exclusion criteria but | which meet inclusion | ||
| results of the search. | are excluded are | criteria and do not | ||
| Any studies which | explained. A PRISMA | meet exclusion | ||
| meet inclusion criteria | figure is included to | criteria. A PRISMA | ||
| and do not meet | illustrate the search | figure is included to | ||
| exclusion criteria but | results. | illustrate the search | ||
| are excluded are | results but it is does | |||
| explained. A PRISMA | not accurately reflect | |||
| figure is included | the search process; | |||
| which accurately | numbers are illogical. | |||
| illustrates the search | ||||
| results. | ||||
| Conclusion (5) | 5 | 4 | 3 | <3 |
| The conclusion | The conclusion | There is either a | There is neither a | |
| reviews the main | reviews the main | summary OR a | conclusion or | |
| topics presented and | topics presented and | conclusion. | summary. | |
| clearly and effectively | summarizes | |||
| summarizes | significant | |||
| significant | conclusions. | |||
| conclusions. | ||||
| Communication in | 20 | 18 | 16 | ≤15 |
| Writing (20) | There is logical | There is logical | There is logical | Any of the following: |
| sequencing of ideas | sequencing of ideas | organization but | there is no evidence | |
| through well- | through well- | some ideas are not | of structure or | |
| developed | developed | fully or consistently | organization; ideas | |
| paragraphs; | paragraphs; | developed OR | are not fully | |
| transitions are used | transitions are usually | transitions are | developed; minimal | |
| to enhance | effective in enhancing | awkward at times | use of transitions | |
| organization. There | organization. There | although the flow is | throughout the paper; | |
| are no more than 2 | are few (2-4) errors in | adequately | there are >8 errors in | |
| errors in punctuation, | punctuation, | maintained. There | punctuation, | |
| capitalization, or | capitalization, | are several (5-8) | capitalization, | |
| spelling. There are no | spelling, sentence | errors in punctuation, | spelling, sentence | |
| errors in sentence | structure or word | capitalization, | structure, or word | |
| structure or word | usage. There are no | spelling, sentence | usage with significant | |
| structure or word | impact on the content |
| Category (points possible) | Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Nearly meets expectations | Does not meet expectation |
| usage. Paraphrasing is used effectively. | more than 2 quotations. | usage. There are more than 2 quotations. | and detracts from the paper; there are more than 4 quotations. | |
| APA (10)Title pageHeadingsCitationsReference pageFont, layout, margins | 10 | 9 | 8 | ≤7 |
| There is consistent adherence to APA criteria in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page with no more than 2 APA errors. Font, layout, and/or margins adhere to APA format. There are no omitted citations. Any quotataions include page number.Secondary citations are avoided but, if necessary, are appropriately cited as such. | There are few (<4) APA errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins. | There are several (<8) errors in title page, headings, citations, reference page, font, layout, and/or margins. | There are major problems with implementation of APA in title page, headings, citations, and/or reference page. Font, layout, and/or margins do not adhere to APA format. | |
| References (20) | 20 | 18 | 16 | ≤15 |
| More than 10 references with at least 8 research references AND only websites used were.org, .edu, or .gov. All research studies are from the United States or there are appropriate reasons given for inclusion of non-US references. | Between 8-10 references with at least 5 research references AND only websites used were.org, .edu, or .gov. All research studies are from the United States or there are appropriate reasons given for inclusion of non-US references. | Between 5-7 references with fewer than 5 research references OR use of.com websites OR 1-2 non-US research studies are used and no appropriate reason are given for their inclusion. | Fewer than 5 nonresearch references and use of.com websites OR more than 2 non-US research studies are used and no appropriate reasons are given for their inclusion. | |
| Total Points Possible: 150 | Comments: | |||
NOTE: Evidence of plagiarism results in a score of 0 for this assignment and possible referral to the professional misconduct committee.